SpamAssassin 3.3.2

breun · **Posted:** Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:48 am

Quote:

2011-06-16: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 has been released, a minor new release primarily to support perl-5.12 and later. Visit the downloads page to pick it up, and for more info.

JimDunn · **Posted:** Mon Aug 29, 2011 11:25 am

Thanks Breun!!

breun · **Posted:** Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:22 am

SpamAssassin 3.3.2 is in atomic-testing now, but it won't install on EL4 due to a missing dependency on perl(Mail::SPF).

Quote:

# yum update spamassassin
(...)
---> Package spamassassin.i386 1:3.3.2-7.el4.art set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: perl(Mail::SPF) for package: spamassassin
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Mail::SPF) is needed by package spamassassin

premierhosting · **Joined:** Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:52 pm **Posts:** 256

Same.

premierhosting · **Joined:** Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:52 pm **Posts:** 256

Here's the fix, enable the EPEL repo:

Code:

wget http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/i386/epel-release-5-4.noarch.rpm
rpm -i epel-release-5-4.noarch.rpm
yum update spamassassin

You're golden.

breun · **Posted:** Fri Oct 14, 2011 3:48 am

I don't think installing EPEL5 on EL4 is a good idea.

And generally, packages in Atomic shouldn't require dependencies from a third-party repo like EPEL, unless requiring this repo would be explicitly mentioned in the Atomic instructions.

scott · **Posted:** Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:40 am

Dependencies should be cleaned up now. Give it a shot and let me know if this is ready for the main repo:

Dependencies Resolved

==================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
==================================================================================================================
Installing:
spamassassin i386 1:3.3.2-7.el5.art atomic-testing 1.2 M
Installing for dependencies:
perl-Archive-Tar noarch 1:1.39.1-2.el5.art atomic 53 k
perl-Compress-Zlib i386 1.42-1.fc6 base 52 k
perl-Digest-HMAC noarch 1.01-15 base 12 k
perl-Digest-SHA1 i386 2.11-1.2.1 base 48 k
perl-Error noarch 1:0.17010-1.el5.art atomic 27 k
perl-HTML-Parser i386 3.55-1.fc6 base 92 k
perl-HTML-Tagset noarch 3.10-2.1.1 base 15 k
perl-IO-Socket-INET6 noarch 2.51-2.fc6 base 13 k
perl-IO-Socket-SSL noarch 1.01-1.fc6 base 49 k
perl-IO-Zlib noarch 1.04-4.2.1 base 15 k
perl-Mail-SPF noarch 2.006-1.el5.art atomic 143 k
perl-Net-DNS i386 0.59-3.el5 base 215 k
perl-Net-IP noarch 1.25-2.fc6 base 31 k
perl-Net-SSLeay i386 1.30-4.fc6 base 195 k
perl-NetAddr-IP i386 4.027-5.el5_6 base 109 k
perl-Socket6 i386 0.19-3.fc6 base 22 k
perl-libwww-perl noarch 5.805-1.1.1 base 376 k
perl-version i386 1:0.7203-2.el5.art atomic 48 k

breun · **Posted:** Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:35 am

I see the perl-Mail-SPF dependency is trying to pull in perl-Git and git-core as dependencies. Does that make sense?

breun · **Posted:** Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:41 am

While trying to find out where that perl-Git dependency came from I installed perl-version and perl-Error and then tried to install perl-Mail-SPF, but I got this:

Code:

# rpm -Uvh perl-Mail-SPF-2.006-1.el4.art.noarch.rpm 
Preparing...                ########################################### [100%]
   file /usr/bin/spfquery from install of perl-Mail-SPF-2.006-1.el4.art conflicts with file from package psa-spf2-1.2.9-10071607

scott · **Posted:** Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:16 pm

wtf are they doing with that. --nodeps it for now

biggles · **Posted:** Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:53 am

Strange. I'm getting these messages...

Code:

spamassassin --lint
Subroutine IO::Socket::INET6::AF_INET6 redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
 at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/INET6.pm line 16
Subroutine Net::DNS::Resolver::Base::AF_INET6 redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
 at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/Resolver/Base.pm line 66

Code:

uname -as
Linux server12.xyz.com 2.6.32.43-6.art.i686.PAE #1 SMP Thu Jul 14 14:35:23 EDT 2011 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux

scott · **Posted:** Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:10 pm

Are you using ipv6? If not this is harmless

biggles · **Posted:** Sat Oct 15, 2011 2:50 pm

Nope, no ipv6. I get that it's harmless, but ossec keeps bugging me about it being an error in the logs...

breun · **Posted:** Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:14 am

I have just tested spamassassin-3.3.2-7.el4.art from atomic-testing and that one seems to work fine so far.

scott · **Posted:** Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:01 am

report that one as a FP and we'll get a rule in there to suppress it

SpamAssassin 3.3.2

Who is online